I just wish the high priests and acolytes of the religion centered around the Hallowed and Immaculate GWM (Global Warming Model) would pick one term and stick with it. Is it global warming or climate change? Then, show me when the climate has NOT changed.
I remember two summers back standing by a sign outside Hyder, Alaska, on a little road up to the glacier, as my CoppaLabio idled impatiently. The sign said that at that spot 9,000 years ago, the ice was 300 feet thick. On the day I was there, the glacier was about 20 miles and 3,000 vertical feet above that spot. I began to wonder how much of that melt-off had occured since the advent of automobiles. I'm guessing not much. WHat caused the rest? Could it be that there is another dominant force causing the change other than hunman activity? If so, if the other force is dominant, how will changing human activity change the outcome? It won't. So might we not be better off spending out time and money to mitigate the consequences of the change that will be caused by this other force, rather than wasting it on behavior changes that will be inconsequential? These were the thoughts that occured to me that day.