RacerX

John, a K&N or BNC filter makes no difference in a stock airbox. Only when the airbox is opened (via whatever means you'd like) will you see a gain. The TPS adjustment is a quick fix, but in no means even come close to a PCIII. - Todd@Guzzitech.com GuzziTech.com

Teros1, actually the stoichiometric value of 14.6~7:1 and/or the optimum power of 12.6:1 does not really apply well to Guzzis. Water-cooled, modern technology is needed for the upper ranges, and while mid 12 ratios work well for power, they'll pay hell on mpg's. Ask the folks here that have mapped in the mid-to-high 13 range about power, pinging, and mpgs. David, actually the posted graph does not show very good numbers for the a/f ratio target, and infact most who I've chatted with that are using the Ti-pipes have gone back to the stock ECU with a PCIII (non-custom/generic map) with decent results. I'd look forward to seeing the (custom PCIII mapped) numbers for this Ti/ECU combo. Back to lurk mode, Todd GuzziTech.com

Victor, I've tried numerous times to contact you direct in regards to the digital dyno run-files for your bike. Please reply here, or direct either way, and let me know where you're at with them. It's really a simple thing. Thanks, Todd.

Gio, sounds like you did not purge the air from the newly filled fork tubes, and they may be slightly overfilled. This whole process is detailed on GuzziTech.com under the Maintenance section - '2.18.02 by Steven Iveson - WP Inverted Fork Oil Change' - GuzziTech.com

Victor, see if you can pull the dynorun files off the dyno computer while you're there at FBF... I'd like to do overlays against some of the other bikes. E-mail them to me at: Todd@GuzziTech.com So Ferracci now stocking the X-pipe? Pictures? Pic on bike? Does this x-pipe compensate for the offest swingarm spacing on the wider-rimmed bikes? Thanks man, Todd

You guys smokin' crack? Callithrix, I've e-mailed you direct and can tweak your map for you. David, I'm still awaiting yours. I'll be adjusting Al's a few more times as well... just need some feedback from him. I've suggested target air/fuel ranges, and those who are saying they are having surging problems have all been mapped too lean. Those digital dynorun files are the tell-all. David, the Dynojet "250 load-cell" Tuning Link Dyno takes most all variations out of the mix here. The software compensates for most everything, though everyone knows that elevation has alot to do with max power. For example, Dynojet in Vegas (which my Jackal was mapped) is 4500' elevation. Dyno Dudes is 1515', and Hare Racing shows 100' and looks to be near some really nice ocean air (which I'm also assuming was really well ventilated). Only the older inertia Dynojet 150 dynos will show higher no's. I'd like to post any/all maps on GuzziTech.com once they have been adjusted and are deemed the best possible test ridden state. I do plan on posting the Dyno graphs there as well, as are the many others already - Thanks for sending your's along, Al. You folks should feel free to e-mail me direct with any questions/comments. I'll try to be of help any way I can. Goin' ridin' now. Todd@GuzziTech.com 'Certified PCIII Tech' MGNOC SoCal Rep PCIII'ed '00 Jackal w/86k+ (s)miles.