Ah Phil, you missed the joke: we 'Murricans spell & speak it funny... No matter.
As for the suitability of aluminum as the material for Guzzi flywheels, we can agree to disagree. My point was that there is marginal need to even go there, since one can machine the steel flywheels down to the point where they are close to the aluminum ones in wt., but manifestly stronger to the point that one does not need to be waiting for them to explode. And the Guzzi donk does like more flywheel mass than an inline four...
Your point that the use of aluminum in airplanes argues that they should be safe for use in flywheels is not pertinent either, simply because the use of aluminum in airplane frames/skin is a vastly different application. You don't see aluminum being used for flywheels in aircraft motors, nor do you see ground vehicles subjected to the extremely cautious & diligent maintenance schedules one must adhere to in aircraft. I'm just sayin' there's a logical discontinuity in your argument. Even if you do spell aluminum funny! ;D
Ok,copy the spelling thing.
I guess we will differ on the flywheel issue,but as I pointed out the RAM units seem to be fine unlike some of the original Guzzi single plate units which apparently DIDN'T use the RAM flywheel.
The RAM flywheel and clutch assembly weigh some 2kg less than the already lightest big twin (V11 Sport)dual plate clutch.Removing another 2kg off the V11 clutch would be rather challenging I would imagine.
With ref to aviation,I wasn't considering aluminium skin structures but other aero applications.The concept that Aluminium compresses under bolted up load and therefor fails as a general statement needed to be challenged.
Ciao