mdude Posted July 3, 2007 Posted July 3, 2007 Swedish/norwegian BIKE magazine tested the 1200Sport against the new R1200R (nekkid one). Surprisingly enough, despite the fact that the BeeM have a lot more power/torque, the 1200Sport was the winner. It was quicker and more fun in the twisties, more alive, had a lot more character in the engine room and was way ahead in the Looks department. Good thing! Especially since the new Beemer has been hailed as a major improvement over the last model. Im beginning to get the urge.....
Guzzirider Posted July 3, 2007 Posted July 3, 2007 Swedish/norwegian BIKE magazine tested the 1200Sport against the new R1200R (nekkid one). Surprisingly enough, despite the fact that the BeeM have a lot more power/torque, the 1200Sport was the winner. It was quicker and more fun in the twisties, more alive, had a lot more character in the engine room and was way ahead in the Looks department. Good thing! Especially since the new Beemer has been hailed as a major improvement over the last model. Im beginning to get the urge..... A friend of mine has a 1200 Sport and she likes it! Just out of interest, did they dyno the Guzzi? If so what were the power and torque readings? Guy
Steve G. Posted July 4, 2007 Posted July 4, 2007 It would be nice if there was even a mention of availability here in Canada, even North America! Ciao, Steve
dlaing Posted July 4, 2007 Posted July 4, 2007 That is a surprise! The specifications would lead one to think the BMW a clear winner, in all categories except character. BMW claimed 107 horsepower at 7,500 rpm and 85 lb-ft of torque at 6,000 rpm, at the crank. estimated 97.3 hp at 7,900 rpm with 74.4 lb-ft torque at 6,400 rpm, at the rear wheel under 500lbs with full tank of gas. ABS igniton immobilizer options traction control heated grips electronic suspension control tire pressure control anti-theft center stand http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/Article_Page...?ArticleID=3498 437# dry weight 109HP rating 74.7 http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/bmw_r1200r_2007.php MG Guzzi claims 93.9 horsepower and 73.8 lb-ft of torque options ABS http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/Article_Page...?ArticleID=3837 505# dry weight 95HP rating 67.1 http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/moto_guzz..._sport_2007.php
mdude Posted July 4, 2007 Author Posted July 4, 2007 A friend of mine has a 1200 Sport and she likes it! Just out of interest, did they dyno the Guzzi? If so what were the power and torque readings? Guy yes, they dynoed it but i cant remember the figures. I sneaked through the mag at the bookstore while the missus was shopping.... I'll have to buy it I guess. Testers didnt like the buzziness of the Beemer.
wavey_davey Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 [Hey Mdude! I'd be real interested in the dyno figures on that 1200 also. Decent test info is hard to come by on these bikes, they seem to have fallen foul of timing, initial "rush" to buy Brevas and Grisos for all those peeps who fancied a Guzz with something other than late 80s dynamics , but now everyone waiting for the 8 valve Here's a compare with the (more powerful than r1200R) 1200 BMW sport thing. The guzz got a good write up being more user friendly than the contorted Bee-em (which is a bit of a shock to traditional Guzz market), but Guzz is waaay down on power, which may, or may not be important, but sure as hell sells bikes! These are crank figures.. whoops, apologies for stutter, and meant to say "shock to trad Beemer market"! bmw_vs_guzz.pdf
Alex-Corsa Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 . It was quicker and more fun in the twisties, more alive, had a lot more character in the engine room Guzzis are "blessed" with character and they are alive..... And you don't get these from whatever else in this planet.... almost. Long live Guzzi
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now