Guest ratchethack Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 Sorry, I assumed that when you said "the preferred choice over straight rate" that you were implying that they were better then straight rate. Maybe you meant they had a higher profit margin? Damnable enough lies and blasphemy for me. I reckon that's all we need. Somebody call in a priest. Anybody got a cigarette? You want a trial or shall we skip the formality?
GuzziMoto Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 Why, the VERY IDEA! To any self-respecting Boy Racer (or BR Wannabe), this rises to the level of being EVERY BIT AS OFFENSIVE as trying to tell you and anyone listening that Sport/Touring tires are superior to Sport tires! Actually, it is more like saying that one size fits all tires are better then tires that are the right size.
Greg Field Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 Sorry, I assumed that when you said "the preferred choice over straight rate" that you were implying that they were better then straight rate. Maybe you meant they had a higher profit margin? Maybe you were talking about rear suspensions? I think Guzzimoto merits the coveted Q.E.D. Award on this one.
Guest ratchethack Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 Here I hang from this here tree. Had the unmitigated GALL to justify my own road suspension preference to a Boy Racer (or BR Wannabe?) Kindly pay the undertaker and have the carver put this on my stone: Come blooming youths, as you pass by And on these lines do cast an eye As you are now, so once was I; As I am now, so must you be; Prepare for death and follow me.
GuzziMoto Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 I think Guzzimoto merits the coveted Q.E.D. Award on this one. Is that a good thing?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now