Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow, knumbnutz, thanks for taking time to post the article with those individual panels! Made it a delight to read and zoom in on the fabulous images.

And if I am reading correctly (and the translation is correct), as meticulous as the Guareschi were, they only lightened the MGS-01 5,5 kg/ 12 pounds? Seems the wheel change alone would have been greater than that (?)

  • Like 1
Posted

Spose at that point one needs a smaller jockey?  

Beautiful though... I love the look of the mgs 01

 

Posted

“Pushes in a crazy way from 5500...”

Yeah baby!  Like my v11 haha!

6k on the v11 is happy times man!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Oh yeah. 5-6K in the canyons..:thumbsup: Careful, now..:oldgit:be *very* smooth with the throttle as you add it through the turn. Whew! These things sound amazing..

Chuck, Deacon

Church of Guzzi

  • Like 3
Posted

A couple of nice points I took away from the article-

Swapping the helical gears in the gearbox for straight cut. Cam is good enough for racing. Valvetrain weakest link. Almost 140hp at around 8500rpm was enough to win against more powerful or lighter bikes because of the power delivery/torque curve. Ride it a different way to get the most out of it (in racing).

One of the most interesting features I gathered from the article is the lack of drag in the drivetrain compared to a chain drive. 

Always good to hear from a racer that competed on a budget DIY bike and came up against the odds - a winner. It's a marvelous achievement and one of the admirable features that I loved in the Britten story.

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, knumbnutz said:

A couple of nice points I took away from the article-

Swapping the helical gears in the gearbox for straight cut. Cam is good enough for racing. Valvetrain weakest link. Almost 140hp at around 8500rpm was enough to win against more powerful or lighter bikes because of the power delivery/torque curve. Ride it a different way to get the most out of it (in racing).

One of the most interesting features I gathered from the article is the lack of drag in the drivetrain compared to a chain drive. 

Always good to hear from a racer that competed on a budget DIY bike and came up against the odds - a winner. It's a marvelous achievement and one of the admirable features that I loved in the Britten story.

You need to read this sort of article with a large dose of Lambrusco. The MGS-01 for instance doesn't use any helical gears in the std gearbox anywhere, just like the V11 gearbox its derived from. A chain has less losses than a shaft and bevel gear assembly no matter what Gianfranco says.  

Its a bit like the Britten story, somewhat larger than the actuality. I love the Britten and its genius creator but the reality is in the cold hard light of day it was slower in lap times than a 600 Supersport of its day.

Ciao

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...