belfastguzzi Posted July 10, 2005 Posted July 10, 2005 this may be old hat: I just came across it cycleworld article on in-line 4 vs. V-twin
O2 V11 Posted July 10, 2005 Posted July 10, 2005 "Then there's the subjective feeling that V-Twins provide. Producing one large power cycle per crank revolution, and staging those pulses at staggered intervals, not only yields a character that can be felt and heard, it punches all the right feel-good buttons." Doctor, I like your medicine... Rob
belfastguzzi Posted July 10, 2005 Author Posted July 10, 2005 Doctor, I like your medicine...Rob 55871[/snapback] supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
helicopterjim R.I.P. Posted July 10, 2005 Posted July 10, 2005 supercalifragilisticexpialidocious 55881[/snapback] even though the sound of it is something quite atrocious!
mike wilson Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Tha article is based on a false premise. The most popular engine (by volume of sales) by at least an order of magnitude is the two stroke single. mike
belfastguzzi Posted July 13, 2005 Author Posted July 13, 2005 Tha article is based on a false premise. The most popular engine (by volume of sales) by at least an order of magnitude is the two stroke single. mike 55941[/snapback] uh well, we all know that lawn mowers would be much more satisfactory machines if they ran v-twin 4 strokes, but when have the masses ever been right?
big J Posted July 13, 2005 Posted July 13, 2005 The masses are always right, but dont forget about the volumes, they're important too. Volumetricality, the way to go.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now