mdude Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Me think it looks good. But it seems to me that the lower part of the fairing might be designed as aftermarket add-on parts. Take those parts off and this bike doesnt look half bad. A LOT better than the fugly new Beemers at least.
coz1100 Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Me think it looks good. But it seems to me that the lower part of the fairing might be designed as aftermarket add-on parts. Take those parts off and this bike doesnt look half bad. A LOT better than the fugly new Beemers at least. 67363[/snapback]
biesel Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 NORGE 1200 Technical Specifications ENGINE Type : 90° V-Twin, 4 stroke Cooling system : air cooled Displacement : 1,133 cc Bore and stroke : 95 x 80 mm Compression ratio : 9.6 : 1 Valve gear : 2 overhead valves operated by light alloy push-rods and rockers; exhaust valve maximum lift: 106° B.T.D.C. of overlap inlet valve maximum lift: 104° A.T.D.C. of overlap Maximum power : over 65 KW (90 CV) at 7,500 rpm Maximum torque : over 95 Nm at 6,800 rpm Fuel system : Weber-Marelli electronic fuel injection with stepper motor control Starting : electric Ignition : inductive discharge, digitally controlled, electronic twin spark ignition Exhaust system : stainless steel, 2 in 1, with tree ways catalyser and Lambda probe oxygen sensor Homologation : Euro 3 TRANSMISSION Gearbox : 6 speed Internal ratios : 1^ 17/38 = 1 : 2.235 : 2^ 20/34 = 1 : 1.700 : 3^ 23/31 = 1 : 1.347 : 4^ 26/29 = 1 : 1.115 : 5^ 31/30 = 1 : 0.967 : 6^ 29/25 = 1 : 0.862 Lubrication : splash Primary drive : helical gears, ratio 26/35=1 :1.458 Final drive : CA.R.C. Compact Reactive Shaft Drive; double universal joint with floating bevel gear, ratio 12/44 = 1:3.667 Clutch : dry CHASSIS Frame : double cradle, in high tensile strenght tubular steel Wheelbase : 1,495 mm Trail : 120 mm Steering head angle : 64,50° Steering angle : 32° Front suspension : telescopic hydraulic fork with Ø 45 mm, preload adjustable Front wheel travel : 120 mm Rear suspension : single arm suspension progressive linkage, rear shock absorber adjustable in rebound ad pre-load (hydraulic) Rear wheel travel : 140 mm Front brake : twin Ø 320 mm stainless steel floating discs, four piston calipers Rear brake : single Ø 282 mm steel disc, 2 piston caliper Wheels : three spokes light alloy wheels, gravity casting Front wheel : 3.50” x 17” Rear wheel : 5.50” x 17” Front tyre : 120/70 ZR17” Rear tyre : 180/55 ZR17” ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Voltage : 12 V Battery : 12 V – 18 Ah Alternator : 12 V – 540 W DIMENSIONS Lenght : 2,195 mm Width : 870 mm Height : 1,125 mm Seat height : 800 mm Ground clearance : 185 mm Rider footrest height : 377 kg Dry weight : 246 kg Fuel tank capacity : 23 litre Reserve : 4 litre Technical specifications of Norge 1200 may change without notice.
docc Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 I wonder if Guzzi has checked trademark rights to use that name in America. It has been a long time since "Norge" has sold refridgerator/freezers here. Many have never heard of them, but we medium-old guys might have trouble poudly telling our buddies we're riding a Norge. I hate to wish difficulty on theireffort but it would be forunate for the name to be blocked here and force them to use a name that roughly translates: "handsome, powerful creature" But "Icebox?" Oh, no . . . "Grantourrismo" would look nice in stylish script.
jrt Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 The original GT Norge (from: http://www.mgcn.nl/dameijer/ ) Nice looking bike in my opinion. Doh, AdamofKC beat me... As Emily Littella used to say- Never mind.
Guest Nogbad Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Since when has 1133cc been a 1200? I think it's ugly. If it sells enough to be profitable I will be surprised.
al_roethlisberger Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 That's really nice looking... good going Guzzi If it performs well, and is reliable, I think they'll have a hit on their hands. It looks a lot like a Yamaha FJR-1300 interestingly though:
zebulon Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Lot of pictures from Anima Guzzista in Milano Show Pictures of the Norge / Griso / California on Guzzisti website Interesting exhaust on the yellow griso
Guzzirider Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Norge = Lets have some exciting bikes Guzzi- you know you can do it. It's rapidly turning into a company that will only attract boring old farts- maybe Griso excepted. The Norge reminds me of a BMW RT Lets have a road legal powerful sportsbike- all the other manufacturers can manage it so screw Piaggios strategy of making it into a cruiser only brand. There- I feel better for that rant and I will take my medication now. Guy
Guest Nogbad Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Norge = Lets have some exciting bikes Guzzi- you know you can do it. It's rapidly turning into a company that will only attract boring old farts- maybe Griso excepted. The Norge reminds me of a BMW RT Lets have a road legal powerful sportsbike- all the other manufacturers can manage it so screw Piaggios strategy of making it into a cruiser only brand. There- I feel better for that rant and I will take my medication now. Guy 67473[/snapback] I couldn't agree more
gh67 Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 Lot of pictures from Anima Guzzista in Milano Show 67465[/snapback] yes....good picutures indeed. I especially like the motorclothes http://www.guzzisti.it/saloni_eventi/milan...es/guzzi019.jpg
Ouiji Veck Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 Oh boy!!! I'm going to get one of these @ dealer cost...maybe less BECAUSE NO MOTORCYCLIST IN THE U.S. WOULD BE CAUGHT DEAD WITH A "NORGE" DO these guys even know anyone in the U.S.? It will be a laughing stock. It's the equivlent of calling it the "TURD" "Hey baby check out my brand new bike...it's a TURD / NORGE. same difference It's a cultural thing. Think again M.G.
beauchemin Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 The Norge looks like the offspring of a Breva and FJR1300. Guzzi could have done a lot better in the styling (and naming) department. Very disappointing.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now