wrong door dude

[staedtler]

blooper after press conf. in Beijing last week (missing the right door)

How do you say... Hey W, F#%$ Off...! in Chinese?

 

 

sad, sad ..sad

[dlaing]

He is kind of like Johnny Carson, but without the brain cells and sense of humor....

But I have to admit, I'd pick the wood door over the red door....Is the the hidden message that the commie RED door is the right door?????

This just blows my mind!!!

[Alex-Corsa]

but without the brain cells and sense of humor....

Dunno about the brain cells , but personally I liked the sence of humor in this one :"I was trying to escape" ....LMAO

[slug]

Oh the fun never stops

 

 

George Going Down, Down, Down...

[antonio carroccio]

Oh the fun never stops

George Going Down, Down, Down...

68298[/snapback]

Do you have something like this for Berlusconi?

I hate that son of a b...!

[slug]

Do you have something like this for Berlusconi?

I hate that son of a b...!

68299[/snapback]

 

 

Only if you can picture Berlusconi as:

 

A bikini-clad woman!

[dlaing]

Slug! Great stuff in that directory!

[slug]

Slug! Great stuff in that directory!

68303[/snapback]

 

 

Oh yeah! A treasure chest of useless delights.

 

I'm trying to exercise some restraint, but I must copy orangeokie by telling everyone:

 

 

 

For the love of God, don't click on the picture!

[dlaing]

But more importantly, I am feeling really stupid because I can't figure this one out....

[slug]

I haven't mathed or geometrized in a long time, so anything I guess would only make me look dumber than I already do...

[dlaing]

But more importantly, I am feeling really stupid because I can't figure this one out....

 

68305[/snapback]

OK I figured it out!

They changed the slope slightly between the Quadrilaterals and the Triangles.

The Quadrilaterals have a 2 in 5 rise while the triangles have a 3 in 8 rise producing angles, if my calculations are correct, of 68.2 and 69.4 degrees respectively...So the image is misleading and the figures underlap in the 5 x 13 + 65 image, but overlap because they drew the lines fat.

[slug]

OK I figured it out!

They changed the slope slightly between the Quadrilaterals and the Triangles.

The Quadrilaterals have a 2 in 5 rise while the triangles have a 3 in 8 rise producing angles, if my calculations are correct, of 68.2 and 69.4 degrees respectively...So the image is misleading and the figures underlap in the 5 x 13 + 65 image, but overlap because they drew the lines fat.

68400[/snapback]

 

 

Hmm, when I tried to figure it out (and gave up), I was working under the assumption that the slices made didn't have thickness, like a cut from a pair of scissors, so I wasn't factoring the line thickness...

 

I sure hope you didn't spend all day figuring this out, otherwise you're a bigger geek than I am.

[slug]

How do you say... Hey W, F#%$ Off...! in Chinese?

 

68207[/snapback]

 

Something like this?

 

什么 操?

[grossohc]

OK I figured it out!

They changed the slope slightly between the Quadrilaterals and the Triangles.

The Quadrilaterals have a 2 in 5 rise while the triangles have a 3 in 8 rise producing angles, if my calculations are correct, of 68.2 and 69.4 degrees respectively...So the image is misleading and the figures underlap in the 5 x 13 + 65 image, but overlap because they drew the lines fat.

68400[/snapback]

Yep thats what i got