callison Posted May 17, 2003 Posted May 17, 2003 Damn, you're right. I forgot to square it. Which explains why I'm a lowly tech instead of an ingrownear, I mean, engineer.
callison Posted May 21, 2003 Posted May 21, 2003 Aha, I stumbled across a source in the USA for the cross over. With a price even! And they are 42.5mm which is too small for the Sport models. http://www.mgcycle.com/specials.html
dlaing Posted May 21, 2003 Posted May 21, 2003 would it not make more sense for the crossover to cross rather than to do a loop back kinda thing? ie. An X rather than a U or H shape. It would mean more tubing, but common sense would suggest a better flow. Of course in the physics of engine design, common sense can be deceiving. example smaller valves can equal more power.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now